Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Qwen3-4B

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 4 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.1

Rank #88 Confirmed

Qwen3-4B Alibaba (Qwen)

31.5

Rank #261 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 3 categories and Qwen3-4B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 28.5.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 82.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 52.2% for Qwen3-4B.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Qwen3-4B specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index43.131.5
Released2026-04-022025-04-29
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0765—
Output $ / M tokens$0.26—
Results tracked286

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), Qwen3-4B: —

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
LMArena Coding1446—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: —, Qwen3-4B: 27.3 (#94)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—35.7%

Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), Qwen3-4B: 18.5 (#264)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
Chess Puzzles6%4%
CritPt0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1438—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85—

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), Qwen3-4B: 28.5 (#228)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%52.2%
MathArena Final-Answer Competitions—38.5%
LMArena Math1469—

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), Qwen3-4B: 33.0 (#198)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
GPQA Diamond73.2%52.3%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%5.7%
LMArena Expert1447—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), Qwen3-4B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), Qwen3-4B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
LMArena Non-English1422—
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1459—
LMArena Russian1434—
LMArena Spanish1415—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), Qwen3-4B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), Qwen3-4B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
LMArena Longer Query1427—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), Qwen3-4B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITQwen3-4B
LMArena Text1434—
LMArena Creative Writing1401—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—
LMArena Multi-Turn1442—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Qwen3-4B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.1 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Qwen3-4B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-4B has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper