Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs phi-3-medium 14B

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

phi-3-medium 14B Microsoft

29.7

Rank #306 Reported

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 9.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 73.2% for Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and 27.6% for phi-3-medium 14B.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and phi-3-medium 14B specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index43.529.7
Released2026-04-022024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.0675—
Output $ / M tokens$0.23—
Results tracked2813

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), phi-3-medium 14B: 36.8 (#201)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
BigCodeBench Instruct—37.6%
LMArena Coding1447—
BigCodeBench Complete—48.7%
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85121.23
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1439—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Adversarial NLI—55.8%
BIG-Bench Hard—81.4%
HellaSwag—82.4%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), phi-3-medium 14B: 27.3 (#250)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—
LMArena Math1470—
MATH Level 5—17.6%

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#306)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
GPQA Diamond73.2%27.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
LMArena Expert1447—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—91.6%
MMLU—78%
OpenBookQA—87.4%
TriviaQA—73.9%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Non-English1421—
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1460—
LMArena Russian1434—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), phi-3-medium 14B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITphi-3-medium 14B
LMArena Text1434—
LMArena Creative Writing1402—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.0 versus 36.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and phi-3-medium 14B share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper