Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs o1-pro
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 29.7.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $150 / $600 for o1-pro.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 200K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 31.5 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2025-03-19 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 200K |
| Max output | 33K | 100K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | $150 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | $600 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), o1-pro: 20.4 (#239)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 23.3% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 6.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1470 | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), o1-pro: 29.7 (#234)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Humanity's Last Exam | — | 8.1% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | — |
| LMArena French | 1460 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), o1-pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | o1-pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than o1-pro?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 31.5 on the Noometry Index.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or o1-pro?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; o1-pro lists at $150 and $600.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT does, with 262K tokens against 200K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and o1-pro share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and o1-pro has 3.