Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Nova Premier 1.0

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

Nova Premier 1.0 Amazon

38.3

Rank #189 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 33.8.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.30 per million input/output tokens, against $2.50 / $12.50 for Nova Premier 1.0.
  • Nova Premier 1.0 accepts more context: 1M tokens versus 262K.
  • Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
ProviderGoogleAmazon
Noometry Index43.538.3
Released2026-04-022025-04-30
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window262K1M
Max output33K10K
Input $ / M tokens$0.09$2.50
Output $ / M tokens$0.30$12.50
Results tracked286

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Nova Premier 1.0: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
LMArena Coding1447—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning Nova Premier 1.0 leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Nova Premier 1.0: 23.0 (#185)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
Kagi LLM Benchmark—44.8%
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1439—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85—

Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Nova Premier 1.0: 33.8 (#199)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—
Omni-MATH—35%
LMArena Math1470—

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Nova Premier 1.0: 35.8 (#180)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
GPQA Diamond73.2%—
MMLU-Pro—72.6%
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—
GPQA (HELM)—51.8%
LMArena Expert1447—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Nova Premier 1.0: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Nova Premier 1.0: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Non-English1421—
LMArena Chinese1495—
LMArena French1460—
LMArena Russian1434—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Nova Premier 1.0: 66.8 (#204)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
IFEval—80.3%
LMArena Instruction Following1420—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Nova Premier 1.0: —

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Longer Query1428—

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Nova Premier 1.0: 51.0 (#178)

BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITNova Premier 1.0
LMArena Text1434—
LMArena Creative Writing1402—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn1441—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Nova Premier 1.0?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 38.3 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Nova Premier 1.0?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.30 per million output tokens; Nova Premier 1.0 lists at $2.50 and $12.50.

Which has the bigger context window?

Nova Premier 1.0 does, with 1M tokens against 262K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Nova Premier 1.0 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Nova Premier 1.0 has 6.

Related comparisons

Go deeper