Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2-Pro
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Pro in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 47.6 to 39.5.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0675 / $0.23 per million input/output tokens, against $0.43 / $0.87 for MiMo-V2-Pro.
- MiMo-V2-Pro accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 262K.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 43.5 | 43.0 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 1.05M |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0675 | $0.43 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.23 | $0.87 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), MiMo-V2-Pro: 43.8 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | 1433 |
| LMArena Coding | 1447 | 1476 |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | 785.17 |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), MiMo-V2-Pro: 22.1 (#206)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1439 | 1457 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 25.8% |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 45.9% |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), MiMo-V2-Pro: 39.5 (#102)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1470 | 1447 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.4 (#111)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1478 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), MiMo-V2-Pro: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), MiMo-V2-Pro: 52.7 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1421 | 1416 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1456 |
| LMArena French | 1460 | 1469 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1427 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1417 | 1457 |
| LMArena German | — | 1417 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1400 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), MiMo-V2-Pro: 76.0 (#49)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1445 |
Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), MiMo-V2-Pro: 41.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1455 |
| CL-bench | — | 15.7% |
| CL-bench Life | — | 6.9% |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Pro leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), MiMo-V2-Pro: 62.8 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1402 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1441 | 1456 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than MiMo-V2-Pro?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiMo-V2-Pro score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.5 vs 43.0), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiMo-V2-Pro?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0675 per million input tokens and $0.23 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Pro lists at $0.43 and $0.87.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiMo-V2-Pro better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.8 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
MiMo-V2-Pro does, with 1.05M tokens against 262K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiMo-V2-Pro share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Pro has 23.