Model comparison
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs MiMo-V2-Omni
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 15 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 15 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 4 categories and MiMo-V2-Omni in 5 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 36.4.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper at $0.0765 / $0.26 per million input/output tokens, against $0.14 / $0.28 for MiMo-V2-Omni.
- Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 42.9 |
| Released | 2026-04-02 | 2026-03-18 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 262K | 262K |
| Max output | 33K | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.0765 | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.26 | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 28 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 38.8 (#156), MiMo-V2-Omni: 42.7 (#87)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1446 | 1467 |
| LMArena WebDev | 1359 | — |
| SciCode | 40% | — |
| WeirdML | 35.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 927.17 | — |
Reasoning MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.1 (#205), MiMo-V2-Omni: 28.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1438 | 1445 |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 6% | — |
| DTBench | 74.9% | — |
| LMCA | 29.7% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.85 | — |
Math Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#61), MiMo-V2-Omni: 36.4 (#112)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1469 | 1432 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 82.2% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.6 (#79), MiMo-V2-Omni: 39.9 (#114)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1447 | 1449 |
| GPQA Diamond | 73.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.2% | — |
Multimodal Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.9 (#43), MiMo-V2-Omni: 37.9 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1260 | 1228 |
Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.3 (#68), MiMo-V2-Omni: 52.0 (#97)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1422 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1495 | 1469 |
| LMArena French | 1459 | 1448 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1412 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1415 | 1432 |
| LMArena German | — | 1398 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1318 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1355 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 75.0 (#78), MiMo-V2-Omni: 75.4 (#62)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1420 | 1428 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#87), MiMo-V2-Omni: 44.1 (#72)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1427 | 1442 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2-Omni leads
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.8 (#110), MiMo-V2-Omni: 61.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 4 26B A4B IT | MiMo-V2-Omni |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1434 | 1424 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1401 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1442 | 1446 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1305 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than MiMo-V2-Omni?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiMo-V2-Omni score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 42.9), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiMo-V2-Omni?
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.0765 per million input tokens and $0.26 per million output tokens; MiMo-V2-Omni lists at $0.14 and $0.28.
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or MiMo-V2-Omni better for coding?
MiMo-V2-Omni scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.7 versus 38.8 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Both accept 262K tokens.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and MiMo-V2-Omni share?
15 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Omni has 18.