Model comparison

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT vs Granite 4.2 30b

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT Google

43.5

Rank #92 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 30b IBM

41.8

Rank #130 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 4.2 30b in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads 45.7 to 39.1.

Side by side

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Granite 4.2 30b specifications
Gemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index43.541.8
Released2026-04-02—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window262K—
Max output33K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.09—
Output $ / M tokens$0.30—
Results tracked2811

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 39.0 (#164), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.0 (#126)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Coding14471396
LMArena WebDev1359—
SciCode40%—
WeirdML35.2%—
ALE-Bench927.17—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 30b leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 21.8 (#213), Granite 4.2 30b: 27.8 (#112)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Hard Prompts14391374
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles6%—
DTBench74.9%—
LMCA29.7%—
Epoch Capabilities Index141.85—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 47.6 (#67), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202582.2%—
LMArena Math1470—

Knowledge Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 45.7 (#85), Granite 4.2 30b: 39.1 (#138)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Expert14471406
GPQA Diamond73.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate5.2%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 40.6 (#46), Granite 4.2 30b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Vision1260—

Multilingual Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 53.1 (#71), Granite 4.2 30b: 47.3 (#151)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Non-English14211340
LMArena Chinese14951414
LMArena Russian14341343
LMArena French1460—
LMArena Spanish1417—

Instruction Following Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 74.8 (#82), Granite 4.2 30b: 71.2 (#155)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Instruction Following14201347

Long Context Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 43.6 (#91), Granite 4.2 30b: 41.4 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Longer Query14281359

Writing & Preference Gemma 4 26B A4B IT leads

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT: 58.6 (#115), Granite 4.2 30b: 53.8 (#156)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 4 26B A4B ITGranite 4.2 30b
LMArena Text14341361
LMArena Creative Writing14021288
LMArena Multi-Turn14411339
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1305—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT better than Granite 4.2 30b?

Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.5 to 41.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 4 26B A4B IT or Granite 4.2 30b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 30b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.0 versus 39.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 4 26B A4B IT and Granite 4.2 30b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 4 26B A4B IT has 28 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 30b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper