Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Step 1o Turbo 202506
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.
Google
StepFunSummary
- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Step 1o Turbo 202506 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads 26.8 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | StepFun | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 39.7 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 14 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 39.2 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1339 |
Reasoning Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 26.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1335 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.6 (#164)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1318 |
Knowledge Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1308 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Step 1o Turbo 202506: 36.1 (#80)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1186 |
Multilingual Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 45.3 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1380 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1314 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1327 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 69.2 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1310 |
Long Context Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 41.0 (#146)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1348 |
Writing & Preference Step 1o Turbo 202506 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Step 1o Turbo 202506: 53.1 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Step 1o Turbo 202506 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1336 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1307 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1340 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Step 1o Turbo 202506?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Step 1o Turbo 202506 better for coding?
Step 1o Turbo 202506 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.2 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Step 1o Turbo 202506 share?
13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Step 1o Turbo 202506 has 14.