Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Solar Pro4
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
UpstageSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Solar Pro4 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Solar Pro4 leads 28.5 to 19.9.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Upstage | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 42.1 |
| Released | — | 2026-08-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 524K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Solar Pro4: 40.1 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1437 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1371 |
Reasoning Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Solar Pro4: 28.5 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1399 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Solar Pro4: 38.8 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1416 |
Knowledge Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Solar Pro4: 39.8 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1427 |
Multilingual Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Solar Pro4: 48.7 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1361 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1415 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1397 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1364 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1309 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1382 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1360 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1401 |
Instruction Following Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Solar Pro4: 72.7 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1377 |
Long Context Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Solar Pro4: 42.1 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1381 |
Writing & Preference Solar Pro4 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Solar Pro4: 56.5 (#138)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Solar Pro4 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1386 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1316 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1385 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Solar Pro4?
Solar Pro4 is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.1 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Solar Pro4 better for coding?
Solar Pro4 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.1 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Solar Pro4 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Solar Pro4 has 18.