Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads 25.5 to 19.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 49.5% for Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 38.1 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 66K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $1.50 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $7.50 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 25 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 35.5 (#223)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1412 |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 55.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1275 |
| GSO | — | 4.9% |
| WeirdML | — | 41.2% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 461.45 |
| AlgoTune | — | 1.44 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 23.9 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 27.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 25.5 (#149)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 49.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1372 |
Math Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.6 (#150)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1365 |
Knowledge Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 37.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1338 |
Multilingual Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 47.7 (#148)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1346 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1357 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1398 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1325 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1310 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1305 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1366 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1360 |
Instruction Following Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 71.6 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1355 |
Long Context Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 42.0 (#131)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1378 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct: 55.3 (#147)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1357 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1333 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1365 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct?
Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (37.3 vs 38.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 35.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3-Coder 480B-A35B Instruct has 25.