Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3.5 Max Preview
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.5 Max Preview in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads 66.0 to 50.1.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 45.3 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 44.0 (#77)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1487 |
Reasoning Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 30.8 (#84)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1483 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 40.1 (#94)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1474 |
Knowledge Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 41.8 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1489 |
Multilingual Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 56.2 (#22)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1465 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1534 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1484 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1487 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1495 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1438 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1471 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1470 |
Instruction Following Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 77.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1467 |
Long Context Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 45.2 (#45)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1476 |
Writing & Preference Qwen3.5 Max Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Qwen3.5 Max Preview: 66.0 (#41)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3.5 Max Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1470 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1464 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1478 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3.5 Max Preview?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.3 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3.5 Max Preview better for coding?
Qwen3.5 Max Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.0 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3.5 Max Preview share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.5 Max Preview has 17.