Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Qwen3 14B
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen3 14B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 14B leads 39.3 to 34.2.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is Kagi LLM Benchmark: 31.5% for Gemma 3n E4b IT and 49.1% for Qwen3 14B.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 35.5 |
| Released | — | 2025-04 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 131K |
| Max output | — | 8K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.35 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.40 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Qwen3 14B: 37.3 (#195)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Qwen3 14B: 29.6 (#83)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 41% |
Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Qwen3 14B: 18.5 (#280)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | 49.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
| DTBench | — | 64% |
| LMCA | — | 18.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 138.23 |
Math Qwen3 14B leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Qwen3 14B: 38.6 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 66.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Qwen3 14B leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Qwen3 14B: 39.3 (#134)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 63.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Qwen3 14B: 38.1 (#204)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.5% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Qwen3 14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Qwen3 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Qwen3 14B?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 35.5 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Qwen3 14B better for coding?
They score almost the same on coding (37.0 vs 37.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Qwen3 14B share?
1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 14B has 12.