Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 7 categories and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct in 1 category; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 50.1 to 34.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 33.0 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 17 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 32.9 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1130 |
Reasoning Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 21.7 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1127 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 33.4 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1173 |
Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.2 (#229)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1108 |
Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 30.6 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1094 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1108 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1110 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1101 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1042 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 954 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1145 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1095 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 57.6 (#268)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1113 |
Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.0 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1120 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct: 34.1 (#272)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1138 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1107 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1088 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.0 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 32.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Medium 4k Instruct has 17.