Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 16 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads 26.4 to 19.9.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 39.4 |
| Released | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.5 (#157)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1347 |
Reasoning Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 26.4 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1322 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
Math Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.3 (#167)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1305 |
Knowledge Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 36.1 (#175)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1308 |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 42.6 (#191)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1275 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1304 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1328 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1282 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1206 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1268 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1336 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
Instruction Following Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 68.6 (#187)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1299 |
Long Context Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 39.9 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1312 |
Writing & Preference Too close to call
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct: 50.2 (#185)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1264 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1309 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct better for coding?
Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct share?
16 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 3.1 32b Instruct has 16.