Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.8 to 37.0.
- Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Amazon | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 33.4 |
| Released | — | 2025-12-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 18 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.8 (#133)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |
Reasoning Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 22.4 (#194)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | — |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | — |
| LMArena French | 1330 | — |
| LMArena German | 1311 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | — |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | — |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?
Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 33.4 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?
Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.8 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.