Model comparison
Gemma 3n E4b IT vs MiMo-V2.5
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 50.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Xiaomi | |
| Noometry Index | 37.3 | 43.4 |
| Released | — | 2026-04-22 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 1.05M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.14 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $0.28 |
| Results tracked | 18 | 23 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1268 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
Reasoning MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1284 | 1450 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 31.5% | — |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
Math MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1251 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
Knowledge MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1246 | 1460 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |
Multilingual MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1285 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1309 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | 1330 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1311 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1272 | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | 1259 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1288 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1305 | 1416 |
Instruction Following MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1255 | 1434 |
Long Context MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1276 | 1445 |
Writing & Preference MiMo-V2.5 leads
Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3n E4b IT | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1306 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1287 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1276 | 1445 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than MiMo-V2.5?
MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?
MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and MiMo-V2.5 share?
17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.