Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs Llama 3.1-8B

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

Llama 3.1-8B Meta

23.0

Rank #352 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 8 categories and Llama 3.1-8B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 34.2 to 8.0.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3.1-8B specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index37.323.0
Released—2024-07-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.05
Output $ / M tokens—$0.08
Results tracked1843

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), Llama 3.1-8B: 20.2 (#340)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
LMArena Coding12681195
SciCode—13.2%
WeirdML—1.7%
BigCodeBench Instruct—32.8%
BigCodeBench Complete—40.5%
HumanEval+—62.8%
MBPP+—55.6%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, Llama 3.1-8B: 22.5 (#131)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard—25.8%
BALROG—15.1%

Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), Llama 3.1-8B: 14.9 (#321)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
LMArena Hard Prompts12841175
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—0%
DTBench—50.9%
LMCA—5.4%
Epoch Capabilities Index—116.57
PIQA—81.2%

Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), Llama 3.1-8B: 10.2 (#317)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
LMArena Math12511179
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—1.7%
Omni-MATH—13.7%
MATH Level 5—22.9%
GSM8K—82.4%

Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), Llama 3.1-8B: 8.0 (#307)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
LMArena Expert12461144
GPQA Diamond—27%
MMLU-Pro—40.6%
GPQA (HELM)—24.7%
BoolQ—82.8%
MMLU—56.1%

Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), Llama 3.1-8B: 34.0 (#249)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
LMArena Non-English12851148
LMArena Chinese13091151
LMArena French13301177
LMArena German13111144
LMArena Japanese12721061
LMArena Korean12591053
LMArena Russian12881158
LMArena Spanish13051169

Instruction Following Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), Llama 3.1-8B: 58.9 (#258)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
LMArena Instruction Following12551159
IFEval—74.3%

Long Context Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), Llama 3.1-8B: 35.8 (#238)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
LMArena Longer Query12761182

Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), Llama 3.1-8B: 29.7 (#290)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITLlama 3.1-8B
LMArena Text13061187
LMArena Creative Writing12871154
LMArena Multi-Turn12761172
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—713
WildBench—68.7%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than Llama 3.1-8B?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 23.0 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or Llama 3.1-8B better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 20.2 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and Llama 3.1-8B share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1-8B has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper