Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GPT-5.5 Instant

GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

GPT-5.5 Instant OpenAI

42.7

Rank #110 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.5 Instant in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-5.5 Instant leads 48.9 to 34.2.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-5.5 Instant specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index37.342.7
Released—2026-05-05
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked1827

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding GPT-5.5 Instant leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), GPT-5.5 Instant: 44.3 (#74)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Coding12681433
SciCode—48.6%

Reasoning GPT-5.5 Instant leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), GPT-5.5 Instant: 24.9 (#155)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Hard Prompts12841426
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles—12%
Epoch Capabilities Index—142.52

Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), GPT-5.5 Instant: 26.5 (#259)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Math12511420
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—26.3%
FrontierMath Tier 4—2.4%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—68.1%

Knowledge GPT-5.5 Instant leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), GPT-5.5 Instant: 48.9 (#74)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Expert12461409
GPQA Diamond—82.5%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, GPT-5.5 Instant: 40.0 (#52)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Vision—1250
LMArena Document—1403

Multilingual GPT-5.5 Instant leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), GPT-5.5 Instant: 52.8 (#80)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Non-English12851417
LMArena Chinese13091456
LMArena French13301428
LMArena German13111411
LMArena Japanese12721408
LMArena Korean12591392
LMArena Russian12881431
LMArena Spanish13051429

Instruction Following GPT-5.5 Instant leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), GPT-5.5 Instant: 74.2 (#100)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Instruction Following12551406

Long Context GPT-5.5 Instant leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), GPT-5.5 Instant: 43.4 (#96)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Longer Query12761422

Writing & Preference GPT-5.5 Instant leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), GPT-5.5 Instant: 61.8 (#85)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-5.5 Instant
LMArena Text13061419
LMArena Creative Writing12871419
LMArena Multi-Turn12761433

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GPT-5.5 Instant?

GPT-5.5 Instant is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.7 to 37.3 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-5.5 Instant better for coding?

GPT-5.5 Instant scores higher on coding benchmarks: 44.3 versus 37.0 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-5.5 Instant share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.5 Instant has 27.

Related comparisons

Go deeper