Model comparison

Gemma 3n E4b IT vs GPT-4 Turbo

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3n E4b IT Google

37.3

Rank #206 Confirmed

GPT-4 Turbo OpenAI

30.5

Rank #292 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher in 8 categories and GPT-4 Turbo in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 3n E4b IT leads 35.1 to 9.0.
  • Gemma 3n E4b IT has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-4 Turbo specifications
Gemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
ProviderGoogleOpenAI
Noometry Index37.330.5
Released—2023-11-06
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$10
Output $ / M tokens—$30
Results tracked1836

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 37.0 (#198), GPT-4 Turbo: 33.8 (#249)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Coding12681268
WeirdML—18%
BigCodeBench Instruct—48.2%
BigCodeBench Complete—58.2%
HumanEval+—86.6%
MBPP+—73.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, GPT-4 Turbo: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
METR Time Horizons—36.7%

Reasoning Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 19.9 (#247), GPT-4 Turbo: 15.3 (#317)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Hard Prompts12841251
SimpleBench—25.1%
Kagi LLM Benchmark31.5%—
Chess Puzzles—6%
DTBench—61.6%
LMCA—9.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.25
ForecastBench—59.4

Math Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 35.1 (#188), GPT-4 Turbo: 9.0 (#322)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Math12511272
FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3)—0.7%
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025—6.7%
MATH Level 5—46.7%

Knowledge Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 34.2 (#198), GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#268)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Expert12461223
GPQA Diamond—46.6%
Confabulations—28.4%
MMLU—81.3%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3n E4b IT: —, GPT-4 Turbo: 30.6 (#110)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Vision—1090

Multilingual Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 43.4 (#183), GPT-4 Turbo: 40.5 (#216)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Non-English12851245
LMArena Chinese13091242
LMArena French13301276
LMArena German13111259
LMArena Japanese12721194
LMArena Korean12591187
LMArena Russian12881259
LMArena Spanish13051260

Instruction Following Too close to call

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 66.1 (#210), GPT-4 Turbo: 65.8 (#216)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Instruction Following12551249

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 38.7 (#191), GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#206)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Longer Query12761254

Writing & Preference Gemma 3n E4b IT leads

Gemma 3n E4b IT: 50.1 (#186), GPT-4 Turbo: 47.7 (#206)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3n E4b ITGPT-4 Turbo
LMArena Text13061272
LMArena Creative Writing12871269
LMArena Multi-Turn12761267

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT better than GPT-4 Turbo?

Gemma 3n E4b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.3 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3n E4b IT or GPT-4 Turbo better for coding?

Gemma 3n E4b IT scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.0 versus 33.8 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3n E4b IT and GPT-4 Turbo share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3n E4b IT has 18 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 Turbo has 36.

Related comparisons

Go deeper