Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct Microsoft

29.3

Rank #314 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 5 categories and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads 29.1 to 11.8.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index28.129.3
Released2025-03-122024-04-23
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked2232

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.9 (#318)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Coding12301101
LiveBench Coding—20.3%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 14.8 (#323)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12531100
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—15.9%
DTBench50.9%—
LiveBench Data Analysis—30.3%
LMCA2.8%—
Adversarial NLI—58.1%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.1%
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—
HellaSwag—77%
LiveBench—24%
WinoGrande—81.5%

Math Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 27.6 (#248)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Math12391151
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—
LiveBench Math—17.6%

Knowledge Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 29.1 (#240)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Expert12231067
GPQA Diamond23.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—90.7%
MMLU—75.7%
OpenBookQA—88%
TriviaQA—58.1%

Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 28.5 (#272)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Non-English12731058
LMArena German12811080
LMArena Russian12941111
LMArena Chinese—1061
LMArena French—1135
LMArena Japanese—966
LMArena Korean—894
LMArena Spanish—1111

Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 51.9 (#292)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12391087
LiveBench Instruction Following—47.2%

Long Context Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 33.0 (#267)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12731088

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct: 31.1 (#284)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BPhi 3 Small 8k Instruct
LMArena Text12911110
LMArena Creative Writing12711083
LMArena Multi-Turn12551068
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—
LiveBench Language—12.9%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct?

Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 4B or Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 27.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Small 8k Instruct has 32.

Related comparisons

Go deeper