Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 5 categories and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 4B leads 42.5 to 25.2.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2024-04-23 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 19 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 28.8 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1039 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 29.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 40.6% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
Reasoning Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 19.6 (#256)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1028 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |
Math Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 31.6 (#222)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1089 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
Knowledge Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct leads
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 26.8 (#254)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 984 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 25.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1000 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1006 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1004 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1016 |
| LMArena French | — | 1039 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 899 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 856 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1059 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 51.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1023 |
Long Context Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 30.4 (#289)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 996 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct: 27.1 (#301)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1050 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 989 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct?
Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 29.7 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 4B or Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct better for coding?
Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 28.8 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Phi 3 Mini 128k Instruct has 19.