Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Olmo 7b Instruct

Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 9 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

28.1

Rank #326 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 4 categories and Olmo 7b Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 4B leads 42.5 to 24.0.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Olmo 7b Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
ProviderGoogleAllen Institute for AI (Ai2)
Noometry Index28.130.3
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked2210

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Olmo 7b Instruct: 29.6 (#303)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Coding12301016

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Olmo 7b Instruct: 18.8 (#274)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts1253993
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA2.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—

Math Olmo 7b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Olmo 7b Instruct: 30.2 (#237)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Math12391018
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
GPQA Diamond23.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—
LMArena Expert1223—

Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Olmo 7b Instruct: 24.0 (#291)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Non-English1273977
LMArena Russian1294947
LMArena Chinese—1014
LMArena German1281—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Olmo 7b Instruct: 49.0 (#301)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following1239978

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Olmo 7b Instruct: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query1273—

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Olmo 7b Instruct: 25.8 (#303)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BOlmo 7b Instruct
LMArena Text12911032
LMArena Creative Writing1271990
LMArena Multi-Turn12551007
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Olmo 7b Instruct?

Olmo 7b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 4B or Olmo 7b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Olmo 7b Instruct share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Olmo 7b Instruct has 10.

Related comparisons

Go deeper