Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Llama 2-7B
Gemma 3 4B and Llama 2-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.1 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Last verified . 14 shared benchmarks.
Google
MetaSummary
- They share 14 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 2-7B in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Gemma 3 4B leads 42.5 to 23.8.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Meta | |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 29.1 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2023-07-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 29 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Llama 2-7B: 29.2 (#307)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1002 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
Reasoning Llama 2-7B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Llama 2-7B: 15.7 (#312)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1009 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 99.06 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 39.2% |
| HellaSwag | — | 77.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 73.3% |
| PIQA | — | 78.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 69.2% |
Math Llama 2-7B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Llama 2-7B: 30.7 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1042 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 16.7% |
Knowledge Llama 2-7B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Llama 2-7B: 28.2 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1036 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 45.9% |
| BoolQ | — | 77.9% |
| MMLU | — | 45.8% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 58.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.7% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: —, Llama 2-7B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.1% |
Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Llama 2-7B: 23.8 (#293)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 973 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 978 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 995 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 973 |
| LMArena French | — | 970 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1007 |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Llama 2-7B: 50.8 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1006 |
Long Context Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Llama 2-7B: 30.4 (#287)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 999 |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Llama 2-7B: 28.0 (#298)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Llama 2-7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1053 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1033 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1029 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Llama 2-7B?
Gemma 3 4B and Llama 2-7B score almost the same on the Noometry Index (28.1 vs 29.1), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.
Is Gemma 3 4B or Llama 2-7B better for coding?
Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.9 versus 29.2 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Llama 2-7B share?
14 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Llama 2-7B has 29.