Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 37.0 to 11.8.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 41.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 16 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 40.0 (#152)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1361 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 27.8 (#113)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1374 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.5 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1359 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 37.0 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1339 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
Multilingual Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 48.9 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1363 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1368 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1417 |
| LMArena French | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1351 |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.0 (#158)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1344 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#136)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 1366 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.4 (#128)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1377 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1359 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1387 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 4B or Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.0 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?
12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.