Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 10 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 32.9 to 15.8.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 39.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.0 (#168)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1320 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 25.0 (#135)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1308 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |
Math Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 32.9 (#180)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.5 (#178)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1285 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1305 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1358 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
Instruction Following Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.7 (#190)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1279 |
Long Context Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1309 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234), Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.4 (#176)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1303 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 4B or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?
Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?
10 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.