Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 1 category and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 in 7 categories; 5 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads 34.2 to 11.8.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 28.1 | 37.9 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 4K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Results tracked | 22 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 35.9 (#215), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 37.1 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1270 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 20.9 (#142), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 13.2 (#335), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 25.0 (#154)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1264 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | 50.9% | — |
| LMCA | 2.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | — |
Math Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 16.8 (#292), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 35.6 (#179)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1274 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | — |
Knowledge Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#299), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 34.2 (#197)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1248 |
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
Multilingual Too close to call
Gemma 3 4B: 42.5 (#194), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 41.7 (#203)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1262 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1258 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1319 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | — |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 3 4B: 65.2 (#225), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 65.5 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1245 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3 4B: 38.7 (#194), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 39.5 (#173)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1273 | 1301 |
Writing & Preference Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.0 (#239), Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10: 47.2 (#214)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1274 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1271 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1275 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.9 to 28.1 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 4B or Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 better for coding?
Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.1 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 share?
11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Standard 2025 02 10 has 12.