Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Granite 4.1 8b

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

27.9

Rank #320 Confirmed

Granite 4.1 8b IBM

36.8

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 2 categories and Granite 4.1 8b in 6 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.1 8b leads 35.5 to 11.8.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Granite 4.1 8b specifications
Gemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index27.936.8
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked2213

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214), Granite 4.1 8b: 29.9 (#291)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Coding12301313
LMArena WebDev—1190

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134), Granite 4.1 8b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330), Granite 4.1 8b: 24.6 (#142)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Hard Prompts12531294
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA2.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—

Math Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286), Granite 4.1 8b: 33.8 (#167)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Math12391311
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—

Knowledge Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294), Granite 4.1 8b: 35.5 (#171)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Expert12231310
GPQA Diamond23.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—

Multilingual Too close to call

Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189), Granite 4.1 8b: 41.8 (#199)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Non-English12731261
LMArena Russian12941238
LMArena Chinese—1335
LMArena German1281—

Instruction Following Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219), Granite 4.1 8b: 67.0 (#198)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Instruction Following12391268

Long Context Too close to call

Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189), Granite 4.1 8b: 38.7 (#188)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Longer Query12741275

Writing & Preference Granite 4.1 8b leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234), Granite 4.1 8b: 48.3 (#199)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 4.1 8b
LMArena Text12911291
LMArena Creative Writing12701249
LMArena Multi-Turn12551269
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Granite 4.1 8b?

Granite 4.1 8b is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.8 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 4B or Granite 4.1 8b better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 29.9 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Granite 4.1 8b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.1 8b has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper