Model comparison

Gemma 3 4B vs Granite 3.0 8b Instruct

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 4B Google

27.9

Rank #320 Confirmed

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct IBM

31.1

Rank #266 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 5 categories and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct in 3 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads 29.1 to 11.8.

Side by side

Gemma 3 4B and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index27.931.1
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output4K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.04—
Output $ / M tokens$0.08—
Results tracked2214

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#297)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Coding12301113
BigCodeBench Instruct—29.3%
BigCodeBench Complete—35.4%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard19.6%—

Reasoning Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 20.0 (#227)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Hard Prompts12531092
Kagi LLM Benchmark25.2%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
DTBench50.9%—
LMCA2.8%—
Epoch Capabilities Index116.02—

Math Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 30.3 (#211)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Math12391143
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20257.5%—

Knowledge Granite 3.0 8b Instruct leads

Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 29.1 (#233)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Expert12231087
GPQA Diamond23.2%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate6.4%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 27.4 (#271)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Non-English12731037
LMArena Russian12941060
LMArena Chinese—1063
LMArena German1281—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 56.2 (#271)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Instruction Following12391088

Long Context Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 34.0 (#247)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Longer Query12741122

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 4B leads

Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234), Granite 3.0 8b Instruct: 31.2 (#280)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 4BGranite 3.0 8b Instruct
LMArena Text12911096
LMArena Creative Writing12701071
LMArena Multi-Turn12551063
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1068—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 4B better than Granite 3.0 8b Instruct?

Granite 3.0 8b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.1 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 4B or Granite 3.0 8b Instruct better for coding?

Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 29.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.0 8b Instruct has 14.

Related comparisons

Go deeper