Model comparison
Gemma 3 4B vs GPT-4 Turbo
GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 300× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4 Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Last verified . 18 shared benchmarks.
GoogleSummary
- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 4B scores higher in 4 categories and GPT-4 Turbo in 4 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where GPT-4 Turbo leads 24.3 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 23.2% for Gemma 3 4B and 46.6% for GPT-4 Turbo.
- Gemma 3 4B is cheaper at $0.04 / $0.08 per million input/output tokens, against $10 / $30 for GPT-4 Turbo.
- Gemma 3 4B accepts more context: 131K tokens versus 128K.
- Gemma 3 4B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | OpenAI | |
| Noometry Index | 27.9 | 30.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2023-11-06 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | 131K | 128K |
| Max output | 4K | 4K |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.04 | $10 |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.08 | $30 |
| Results tracked | 22 | 36 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 35.3 (#214), GPT-4 Turbo: 33.4 (#247)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1230 | 1268 |
| WeirdML | — | 18% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | — | 48.2% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | — | 58.2% |
| HumanEval+ | — | 86.6% |
| MBPP+ | — | 73.3% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: 20.7 (#134), GPT-4 Turbo: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 19.6% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | — | 36.7% |
Reasoning GPT-4 Turbo leads
Gemma 3 4B: 12.7 (#330), GPT-4 Turbo: 14.9 (#311)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 6% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1253 | 1251 |
| DTBench | 50.9% | 61.6% |
| LMCA | 2.8% | 9.8% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 116.02 | 127.25 |
| SimpleBench | — | 25.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 25.2% | — |
| ForecastBench | — | 59.4 |
Math Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 15.8 (#286), GPT-4 Turbo: 8.6 (#316)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 7.5% | 6.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1239 | 1272 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 0.7% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 46.7% |
Knowledge GPT-4 Turbo leads
Gemma 3 4B: 11.8 (#294), GPT-4 Turbo: 24.3 (#263)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 23.2% | 46.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1223 | 1223 |
| Confabulations | — | 28.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 6.4% | — |
| MMLU | — | 81.3% |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 4B: —, GPT-4 Turbo: 30.0 (#104)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1090 |
Multilingual Gemma 3 4B leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.7 (#189), GPT-4 Turbo: 40.7 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1245 |
| LMArena German | 1281 | 1259 |
| LMArena Russian | 1294 | 1259 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1242 |
| LMArena French | — | 1275 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1194 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1187 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1260 |
Instruction Following Too close to call
Gemma 3 4B: 65.4 (#219), GPT-4 Turbo: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1239 | 1250 |
Long Context Too close to call
Gemma 3 4B: 38.6 (#189), GPT-4 Turbo: 38.0 (#200)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1274 | 1254 |
Writing & Preference GPT-4 Turbo leads
Gemma 3 4B: 42.2 (#234), GPT-4 Turbo: 47.9 (#201)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 4B | GPT-4 Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1291 | 1272 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1270 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1255 | 1267 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1068 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 4B better than GPT-4 Turbo?
GPT-4 Turbo is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.3 to 27.9 on the Noometry Index. Gemma 3 4B costs 300× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-4 Turbo's lead doesn't matter for your workload.
Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 4B or GPT-4 Turbo?
Gemma 3 4B is cheaper. It lists at $0.04 per million input tokens and $0.08 per million output tokens; GPT-4 Turbo lists at $10 and $30.
Is Gemma 3 4B or GPT-4 Turbo better for coding?
Gemma 3 4B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.3 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.
Which has the bigger context window?
Gemma 3 4B does, with 131K tokens against 128K.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 4B and GPT-4 Turbo share?
18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 4B has 22 scored results on Noometry and GPT-4 Turbo has 36.