Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Wizardlm 70b

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 12 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

Wizardlm 70b Microsoft

33.0

Rank #249 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Wizardlm 70b in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemma 3 27B leads 52.5 to 34.8.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and Wizardlm 70b specifications
Gemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
ProviderGoogleMicrosoft
Noometry Index30.833.0
Released2025-03-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.16—
Results tracked4312

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Wizardlm 70b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Wizardlm 70b: 31.4 (#285)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Coding13221081
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Wizardlm 70b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Wizardlm 70b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Wizardlm 70b: 20.7 (#234)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Hard Prompts13401079
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04—
LiveBench50%—

Math Wizardlm 70b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Wizardlm 70b: 32.2 (#218)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Math13121116
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
LiveBench Math55.4%—
MATH Level 574%—

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Wizardlm 70b: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
GPQA Diamond47.7%—
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1304—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Wizardlm 70b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Vision1164—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Wizardlm 70b: 29.6 (#265)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Non-English13341078
LMArena Chinese13461052
LMArena German13621083
LMArena Russian13491155
LMArena French1368—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Spanish1349—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Wizardlm 70b: 56.3 (#273)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Instruction Following13211093
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—

Long Context Wizardlm 70b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Wizardlm 70b: 33.3 (#263)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Longer Query13331097
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Wizardlm 70b: 34.8 (#269)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BWizardlm 70b
LMArena Text13581120
LMArena Creative Writing13461149
LMArena Multi-Turn13451108
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Wizardlm 70b?

Wizardlm 70b is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.0 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 27B or Wizardlm 70b better for coding?

Wizardlm 70b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.4 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Wizardlm 70b share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 70b has 12.

Related comparisons

Go deeper