Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs StarCoder 2 7B

Gemma 3 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#277); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.5

Rank #277 Confirmed

StarCoder 2 7B NVIDIA

36.5

Unranked Sparse

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 0 categories and StarCoder 2 7B in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where StarCoder 2 7B leads 34.2 to 22.1.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and StarCoder 2 7B specifications
Gemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
ProviderGoogleNVIDIA
Noometry Index30.536.5
Released2025-03-112024-02-20
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.16—
Results tracked437

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding StarCoder 2 7B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329), StarCoder 2 7B: 34.2

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—
LMArena Coding1322—
BigCodeBench Complete—27.7%
HumanEval+—29.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
Epoch Capabilities Index130.0492.92
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
LMArena Hard Prompts1340—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
LiveBench50%—
WinoGrande—57.1%

Math Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
LiveBench Math55.4%—
LMArena Math1312—
MATH Level 574%—
GSM8K—32.7%

Knowledge Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
GPQA Diamond47.7%—
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—
LMArena Expert1303—
ARC (AI2) Challenge—38.7%
MMLU—38.8%

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Vision1165—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Non-English1334—
LMArena Chinese1347—
LMArena French1368—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Russian1349—
LMArena Spanish1348—

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—
LMArena Instruction Following1321—

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—
LMArena Longer Query1333—

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161), StarCoder 2 7B: —

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BStarCoder 2 7B
LMArena Text1358—
LMArena Creative Writing1346—
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LMArena Multi-Turn1344—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than StarCoder 2 7B?

Gemma 3 27B has enough public results to be ranked (#277); StarCoder 2 7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

Is Gemma 3 27B or StarCoder 2 7B better for coding?

StarCoder 2 7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 34.2 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and StarCoder 2 7B share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and StarCoder 2 7B has 7.

Related comparisons

Go deeper