Model comparison
Gemma 3 27B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B
Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 7 shared benchmarks.
Google
Allen Institute for AI (Ai2)Summary
- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 5 categories and OLMo 2 Furious 13B in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where Gemma 3 27B leads 70.6 to 60.9.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LiveBench Math: 55.4% for Gemma 3 27B and 13.6% for OLMo 2 Furious 13B.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) | |
| Noometry Index | 30.8 | 29.7 |
| Released | 2025-03-11 | 2024-12-31 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | 131K | — |
| Max output | 8K | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | $0.08 | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | $0.16 | — |
| Results tracked | 43 | 12 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding OLMo 2 Furious 13B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Coding | 39.9% | 10.4% |
| Aider Polyglot | 4.9% | — |
| SciCode | 21.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1322 | — |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 29.5% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | 43.8% | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 51.5% | 20.6% |
| LiveBench | 50% | 22.1% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 40.4% | — |
| CritPt | 0% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1340 | — |
| DTBench | 52.5% | — |
| LMCA | 12.3% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 130.04 | — |
Math Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Math | 55.4% | 13.6% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 22.5% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LMArena Math | 1312 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 74% | — |
Knowledge Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 47.7% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| Confabulations | 40.3% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 7.4% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1304 | — |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | 1164 | — |
| GeoBench | 52% | — |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1334 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1346 | — |
| LMArena French | 1368 | — |
| LMArena German | 1362 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1287 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1308 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1349 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1349 | — |
Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 74.9% | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1321 | — |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | 33.3% | — |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1333 | — |
Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads
Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 27B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Language | 34.6% | 11.2% |
| LMArena Text | 1358 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1346 | — |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 79.9% | — |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1266 | — |
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1345 | — |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 27B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?
Gemma 3 27B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 29.7 on the Noometry Index.
Is Gemma 3 27B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?
OLMo 2 Furious 13B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 28.6 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?
7 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.