Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Hy3

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 17 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

Hy3 Tencent

44.2

Rank #79 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 0 categories and Hy3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hy3 leads 46.8 to 22.5.
  • Gemma 3 27B is cheaper at $0.08 / $0.16 per million input/output tokens, against $0.0825 / $0.33 for Hy3.
  • Hy3 accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 131K.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27BHy3
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index30.844.2
Released2025-03-112026-07-06
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K262K
Max output8K128K
Input $ / M tokens$0.08$0.0825
Output $ / M tokens$0.16$0.33
Results tracked4319

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hy3 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Hy3: 46.8 (#63)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
LMArena Coding13221464
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
LMArena WebDev—1508
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Hy3: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Hy3 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Hy3: 26.1 (#136)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
LMArena Hard Prompts13401447
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
NYT Connections (extended)—41.2%
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04—
LiveBench50%—

Math Hy3 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Hy3: 40.1 (#93)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
LMArena Math13121475
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
LiveBench Math55.4%—
MATH Level 574%—

Knowledge Hy3 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Hy3: 40.8 (#114)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
LMArena Expert13041460
GPQA Diamond47.7%—
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Hy3: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
LMArena Vision1164—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Hy3 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Hy3: 53.5 (#65)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
LMArena Non-English13341426
LMArena Chinese13461493
LMArena French13681461
LMArena German13621439
LMArena Japanese12871392
LMArena Korean13081395
LMArena Russian13491432
LMArena Spanish13491456

Instruction Following Hy3 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Hy3: 75.1 (#70)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
LMArena Instruction Following13211426
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—

Long Context Hy3 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Hy3: 44.1 (#75)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
LMArena Longer Query13331442
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—

Writing & Preference Hy3 leads

Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Hy3: 62.2 (#81)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHy3
LMArena Text13581439
LMArena Creative Writing13461402
LMArena Multi-Turn13451436
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Hy3?

Hy3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 44.2 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Which is cheaper, Gemma 3 27B or Hy3?

Gemma 3 27B is cheaper. It lists at $0.08 per million input tokens and $0.16 per million output tokens; Hy3 lists at $0.0825 and $0.33.

Is Gemma 3 27B or Hy3 better for coding?

Hy3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.8 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.

Which has the bigger context window?

Hy3 does, with 262K tokens against 131K.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Hy3 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Hy3 has 19.

Related comparisons

Go deeper