Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Hunyuan Large Vision

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 13 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.8

Rank #284 Confirmed

Hunyuan Large Vision Tencent

37.6

Rank #202 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Hunyuan Large Vision in 6 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Hunyuan Large Vision leads 38.3 to 22.5.
  • Gemma 3 27B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index30.837.6
Released2025-03-11—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.16—
Results tracked4313

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 3 27B: 22.5 (#334), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.3 (#180)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Coding13221308
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 25.1 (#110), Hunyuan Large Vision: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.7 (#301), Hunyuan Large Vision: 24.8 (#158)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Hard Prompts13401257
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04—
LiveBench50%—

Math Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.9 (#265), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.5 (#183)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Math13121268
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
LiveBench Math55.4%—
MATH Level 574%—

Knowledge Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.5 (#261), Hunyuan Large Vision: 34.4 (#196)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Expert13041252
GPQA Diamond47.7%—
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multimodal Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 3 27B: 32.6 (#100), Hunyuan Large Vision: 35.7 (#83)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Vision11641180
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 46.9 (#155), Hunyuan Large Vision: 39.9 (#221)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Non-English13341236
LMArena Chinese13461287
LMArena Russian13491243
LMArena French1368—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Spanish1349—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 70.6 (#160), Hunyuan Large Vision: 65.8 (#215)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Instruction Following13211251
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—

Long Context Hunyuan Large Vision leads

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#293), Hunyuan Large Vision: 38.9 (#189)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Longer Query13331280
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 52.5 (#168), Hunyuan Large Vision: 46.5 (#218)

BenchmarkGemma 3 27BHunyuan Large Vision
LMArena Text13581263
LMArena Creative Writing13461248
LMArena Multi-Turn13451254
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Hunyuan Large Vision?

Hunyuan Large Vision is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.6 to 30.8 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 27B or Hunyuan Large Vision better for coding?

Hunyuan Large Vision scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.3 versus 22.5 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Hunyuan Large Vision share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Large Vision has 13.

Related comparisons

Go deeper