Model comparison

Gemma 3 27B vs Granite 4.2 3b

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 11 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 27B Google

30.5

Rank #277 Confirmed

Granite 4.2 3b IBM

39.0

Rank #163 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 27B scores higher in 3 categories and Granite 4.2 3b in 4 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in coding, where Granite 4.2 3b leads 39.4 to 22.1.

Side by side

Gemma 3 27B and Granite 4.2 3b specifications
Gemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
ProviderGoogleIBM
Noometry Index30.539.0
Released2025-03-11—
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window131K—
Max output8K—
Input $ / M tokens$0.08—
Output $ / M tokens$0.16—
Results tracked4311

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 22.1 (#329), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.4 (#146)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Coding13221363
Aider Polyglot4.9%—
SciCode21.2%—
LiveBench Coding39.9%—

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 24.9 (#105), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard29.5%—

Reasoning Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 16.3 (#297), Granite 4.2 3b: 25.0 (#136)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Hard Prompts13401308
Kagi LLM Benchmark40.4%—
CritPt0%—
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning43.8%—
DTBench52.5%—
LiveBench Data Analysis51.5%—
LMCA12.3%—
Epoch Capabilities Index130.04—
LiveBench50%—

Math Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 24.4 (#261), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-202522.5%—
LiveBench Math55.4%—
LMArena Math1312—
MATH Level 574%—

Knowledge Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 25.4 (#256), Granite 4.2 3b: 35.6 (#169)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Expert13031313
GPQA Diamond47.7%—
Confabulations40.3%—
Vectara Hallucination Rate7.4%—

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 27B: 32.0 (#94), Granite 4.2 3b: —

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Vision1165—
GeoBench52%—

Multilingual Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 47.0 (#150), Granite 4.2 3b: 42.4 (#193)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Non-English13341268
LMArena Chinese13471268
LMArena Russian13491249
LMArena French1368—
LMArena German1362—
LMArena Japanese1287—
LMArena Korean1308—
LMArena Spanish1348—

Instruction Following Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 70.8 (#155), Granite 4.2 3b: 67.2 (#195)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Instruction Following13211271
LiveBench Instruction Following74.9%—

Long Context Granite 4.2 3b leads

Gemma 3 27B: 27.6 (#288), Granite 4.2 3b: 39.3 (#179)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Longer Query13331293
Fiction.LiveBench33.3%—

Writing & Preference Gemma 3 27B leads

Gemma 3 27B: 52.7 (#161), Granite 4.2 3b: 47.9 (#202)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 27BGranite 4.2 3b
LMArena Text13581295
LMArena Creative Writing13461215
LMArena Multi-Turn13441293
Short-Story Creative Writing79.9%—
EQ-Bench Creative Writing1266—
LiveBench Language34.6%—

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 27B better than Granite 4.2 3b?

Granite 4.2 3b is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.0 to 30.5 on the Noometry Index.

Is Gemma 3 27B or Granite 4.2 3b better for coding?

Granite 4.2 3b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.4 versus 22.1 in the Noometry coding category.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 27B and Granite 4.2 3b share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 27B has 43 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 3b has 11.

Related comparisons

Go deeper