Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen3.8 Max
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.8 Max in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen3.8 Max leads 73.1 to 9.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 1.1% for Gemma 3 1B and 100% for Qwen3.8 Max.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 56.0 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2026-08-02 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | 1M |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $6 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 38 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 52.3 (#30)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 57.5% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1671 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 15.8% |
| SciCode | — | 52.9% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1499 |
Agentic & Tool Use Qwen3.8 Max leads
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Qwen3.8 Max: 42.6 (#17)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 55.1% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 23.2% |
Reasoning Qwen3.8 Max leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Qwen3.8 Max: 53.4 (#26)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 40% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 88.3% |
| CritPt | — | 20% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1493 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 38% |
| DTBench | — | 92% |
| LMCA | — | 46.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 156.69 |
Math Qwen3.8 Max leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Qwen3.8 Max: 73.1 (#15)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | 100% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 74.7% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 46.3% |
| ProofBench | — | 58% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1498 |
Knowledge Qwen3.8 Max leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Qwen3.8 Max: 61.7 (#25)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | 92.7% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 47.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1504 |
Multimodal Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 36.9 (#70)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1314 |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 20% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 56.6 (#18)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1468 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1537 |
| LMArena French | — | 1502 |
| LMArena German | — | 1489 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1466 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1467 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1478 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1495 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 77.7 (#19)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1478 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 45.5 (#30)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1486 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen3.8 Max: 67.0 (#31)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen3.8 Max |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1480 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1478 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1487 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen3.8 Max?
Qwen3.8 Max is the stronger model overall, scoring 56.0 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen3.8 Max share?
3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.8 Max has 38.