Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)
Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#348); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | — |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2024-09-18 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 6 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.93 |
| HellaSwag | — | 76.8% |
| WinoGrande | — | 72.9% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 86.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B): —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 60.9% |
| MMLU | — | 68% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B)?
Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#348); Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5-Coder (1.5B) has 6.