Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 2 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

21.1

Rank #353 Reported

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct Alibaba (Qwen)

31.9

Rank #267 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads 27.0 to 7.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B and 49.1% for Qwen2.5 72B Instruct.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
ProviderGoogleAlibaba (Qwen)
Noometry Index21.131.9
Released2025-03-122024-09
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—131K
Max output—8K
Input $ / M tokens—$1.40
Output $ / M tokens—$5.60
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 33.2 (#260)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
WeirdML—16%
BigCodeBench Instruct—45.8%
LMArena Coding—1292
BigCodeBench Complete—55.9%

Agentic & Tool Use Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.1 (#133)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%—
TheAgentCompany—5.7%
BALROG—16.2%
METR Time Horizons—35.8%

Reasoning Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 22.3 (#199)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1271
DTBench—62.9%
LMCA—13.4%
BIG-Bench Hard—79.8%
Epoch Capabilities Index—129
ForecastBench—57.5
HellaSwag—84.8%
PIQA—82.6%
WinoGrande—82.3%

Math Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 19.3 (#287)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%8.1%
Omni-MATH—33%
LMArena Math—1283
MATH Level 5—63.2%

Knowledge Qwen2.5 72B Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 27.0 (#253)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
GPQA Diamond19.9%49.1%
MMLU-Pro—63.1%
Confabulations—19.1%
GPQA (HELM)—42.6%
LMArena Expert—1245
ARC (AI2) Challenge—94.5%
MMLU—85.3%
TriviaQA—71.9%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 41.0 (#213)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1252
LMArena Chinese—1272
LMArena French—1280
LMArena German—1234
LMArena Japanese—1180
LMArena Korean—1188
LMArena Russian—1264
LMArena Spanish—1256

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 65.5 (#221)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
IFEval—80.6%
LMArena Instruction Following—1254

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 38.9 (#188)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Longer Query—1282

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen2.5 72B Instruct: 46.7 (#215)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BQwen2.5 72B Instruct
LMArena Text—1269
LMArena Creative Writing—1221
WildBench—80.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1272

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.9 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 72B Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper