Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen1.5 4b Chat
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.3 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads 26.2 to 7.1.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 28.3 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 28.6 (#305)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 999 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 17.7 (#277)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 976 |
Math Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 27.9 (#233)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1026 |
Knowledge Qwen1.5 4b Chat leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 26.2 (#252)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 980 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 24.2 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 979 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1024 |
| LMArena German | — | 902 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 952 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 49.3 (#295)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 979 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 30.1 (#285)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 988 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen1.5 4b Chat: 23.9 (#304)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen1.5 4b Chat |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 997 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 969 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 977 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen1.5 4b Chat?
Qwen1.5 4b Chat is the stronger model overall, scoring 28.3 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen1.5 4b Chat share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5 4b Chat has 13.