Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Qwen-14B
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Alibaba (Qwen)Summary
- The widest gap is in math, where Qwen-14B leads 28.7 to 9.6.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Alibaba (Qwen) | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 30.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2023-09-24 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 18 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen-14B: 30.6 (#283)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1072 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Qwen-14B: 18.7 (#255)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1027 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 112.8 |
| LAMBADA | — | 71.1% |
| PIQA | — | 79.9% |
Math Qwen-14B leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Qwen-14B: 28.7 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1068 |
| GSM8K | — | 61.3% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Qwen-14B: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 84.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 86.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.3% |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen-14B: 27.7 (#270)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1042 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1077 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen-14B: 52.6 (#284)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1031 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen-14B: 31.3 (#276)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1029 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Qwen-14B: 27.8 (#294)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Qwen-14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1051 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1028 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1022 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Qwen-14B?
Qwen-14B is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Qwen-14B share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Qwen-14B has 18.