Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Phi-3.5-MoE
Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#353); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSide by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Phi-3.5-MoE | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | — |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2024-08-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 3 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| PIQA | — | 88.6% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 88.7% |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Phi-3.5-MoE: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-3.5-MoE |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| BoolQ | — | 84.6% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Phi-3.5-MoE?
Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#353); Phi-3.5-MoE does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Phi-3.5-MoE share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Phi-3.5-MoE has 3.