Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Phi-2
Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#353); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSide by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Phi-2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | — |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2023-12-12 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 11 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | — | 45.1% |
| MBPP+ | — | 54.2% |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 42.5% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 59.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 107.94 |
| HellaSwag | — | 53.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 54.7% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Phi-2: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 75.9% |
| MMLU | — | 58.4% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 73.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 45.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Phi-2?
Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#353); Phi-2 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Phi-2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Phi-2 has 11.