Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Phi-1.5
Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#348); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
MicrosoftSide by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Microsoft | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | — |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2023-09-11 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 7 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 90.82 |
| HellaSwag | — | 47.6% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73.4% |
Math Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
Knowledge Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Phi-1.5: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Phi-1.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 44.4% |
| BoolQ | — | 75.8% |
| MMLU | — | 37.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 37.2% |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Phi-1.5?
Gemma 3 1B has enough public results to be ranked (#348); Phi-1.5 does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Phi-1.5 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Phi-1.5 has 7.