Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Mistral Small 3.1

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

20.7

Rank #348 Reported

Mistral Small 3.1 Mistral AI

31.4

Rank #263 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Mistral Small 3.1 in 3 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Mistral Small 3.1 leads 22.6 to 7.1.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B and 41.9% for Mistral Small 3.1.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Mistral Small 3.1 specifications
Gemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
ProviderGoogleMistral AI
Noometry Index20.731.4
Released2025-03-122025-03-17
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—102K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.35
Output $ / M tokens—$0.56
Results tracked428

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 37.7 (#175)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Coding—1309

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Mistral Small 3.1: —

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%—

Reasoning Too close to call

Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Mistral Small 3.1: 18.9 (#249)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
Chess Puzzles0%1%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1278
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.48

Math Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Mistral Small 3.1: 13.7 (#295)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%3.9%
Omni-MATH—24.8%
LMArena Math—1261

Knowledge Mistral Small 3.1 leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Mistral Small 3.1: 22.6 (#266)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
GPQA Diamond19.9%41.9%
MMLU-Pro—61%
GPQA (HELM)—39.2%
LMArena Expert—1258

Multimodal Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 32.6 (#93)

Multimodal benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Vision—1136

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 41.4 (#204)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Non-English—1255
LMArena Chinese—1254
LMArena French—1270
LMArena German—1266
LMArena Japanese—1210
LMArena Korean—1206
LMArena Russian—1263
LMArena Spanish—1283

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 63.8 (#225)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
IFEval—75%
LMArena Instruction Following—1264

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 39.5 (#172)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Longer Query—1300

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Mistral Small 3.1: 37.2 (#254)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BMistral Small 3.1
LMArena Text—1278
LMArena Creative Writing—1253
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—761
WildBench—78.8%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1270

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Mistral Small 3.1?

Mistral Small 3.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Mistral Small 3.1 share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Mistral Small 3.1 has 28.

Related comparisons

Go deeper