Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs MiniMax-M2
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Summary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiniMax-M2 leads 37.0 to 7.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | MiniMax | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 37.4 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2025-10-27 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 205K |
| Max output | — | 131K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $0.30 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $1.20 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 21 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2: 39.3 (#159)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | — | 61% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1297 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1370 |
Agentic & Tool Use MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), MiniMax-M2: 25.1 (#109)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 30% |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 160.6 |
Reasoning Too close to call
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), MiniMax-M2: 19.4 (#258)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 57.8% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 14.8% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1357 |
Math MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), MiniMax-M2: 37.3 (#160)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1352 |
Knowledge MiniMax-M2 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), MiniMax-M2: 37.0 (#163)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1337 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2: 45.3 (#171)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1313 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1366 |
| LMArena French | — | 1335 |
| LMArena German | — | 1355 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1326 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2: 70.2 (#166)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1328 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2: 40.5 (#153)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1331 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, MiniMax-M2: 53.0 (#162)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | MiniMax-M2 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1340 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1286 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1361 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than MiniMax-M2?
MiniMax-M2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.4 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and MiniMax-M2 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2 has 21.