Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Magistral Medium
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
Mistral AISummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Magistral Medium leads 33.5 to 7.0.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Mistral AI | |
| Noometry Index | 21.1 | 35.2 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | 2025-03-17 |
| Weights | Open | Open |
| Context window | — | 262K |
| Max output | — | 16K |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | $2 |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | $5 |
| Results tracked | 4 | 22 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Magistral Medium: 39.1 (#161)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 39.2% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1319 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Magistral Medium: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Gemma 3 1B leads
Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Magistral Medium: 8.6 (#348)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 16.2% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 6.1% |
| CritPt | — | 0.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1267 |
Math Magistral Medium leads
Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Magistral Medium: 35.1 (#189)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1250 |
Knowledge Magistral Medium leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Magistral Medium: 33.5 (#202)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1223 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Magistral Medium: 39.6 (#224)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1232 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1227 |
| LMArena French | — | 1267 |
| LMArena German | — | 1248 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1175 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1125 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1224 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1271 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Magistral Medium: 66.0 (#211)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1254 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Magistral Medium: 39.3 (#183)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1295 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Magistral Medium: 46.3 (#219)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Magistral Medium |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1255 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1245 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1275 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Magistral Medium?
Magistral Medium is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.2 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Magistral Medium share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Magistral Medium has 22.