Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 3 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

21.1

Rank #353 Reported

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct Meta

30.6

Rank #291 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 1 category and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct in 3 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads 30.6 to 7.0.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is GPQA Diamond: 19.9% for Gemma 3 1B and 47.4% for Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct specifications
Gemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
ProviderGoogleMeta
Noometry Index21.130.6
Released2025-03-122024-12-06
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—128K
Max output—4K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.10
Output $ / M tokens—$0.32
Results tracked443

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 31.0 (#290)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
SciCode—26%
WeirdML—14.4%
BigCodeBench Instruct—46.9%
LiveBench Coding—36.6%
LMArena Coding—1268
BigCodeBench Complete—57.5%

Agentic & Tool Use Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 13.7 (#152), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 25.8 (#105)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%31.9%
BALROG—23%

Reasoning Gemma 3 1B leads

Gemma 3 1B: 19.2 (#264), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 14.1 (#327)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
SimpleBench—19.9%
CritPt—0%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LiveBench Reasoning—50.8%
LMArena Hard Prompts—1257
DTBench—59.5%
LiveBench Data Analysis—49.5%
LMCA—17.5%
Epoch Capabilities Index—127.33
ForecastBench—58.6
LiveBench—50.2%

Math Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 10.2 (#316), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 15.3 (#298)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%5.1%
LiveBench Math—42.2%
LMArena Math—1267
MATH Level 5—41.6%

Knowledge Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.0 (#314), Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 30.6 (#226)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
GPQA Diamond19.9%47.4%
Confabulations—22.8%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—4.1%
LMArena Expert—1225
MMLU—86.3%

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 39.9 (#220)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Non-English—1236
LMArena Chinese—1217
LMArena French—1281
LMArena German—1251
LMArena Japanese—1150
LMArena Korean—1143
LMArena Russian—1252
LMArena Spanish—1270

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 71.1 (#157)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LiveBench Instruction Following—82.7%
LMArena Instruction Following—1242

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 26.4 (#295)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
Fiction.LiveBench—33.3%
LMArena Longer Query—1256

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct: 47.6 (#207)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BLlama-3.3-70B-Instruct
LMArena Text—1274
LMArena Creative Writing—1250
LMArena Multi-Turn—1280
LiveBench Language—39.2%

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct?

Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 30.6 to 21.1 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Llama-3.3-70B-Instruct has 43.

Related comparisons

Go deeper