Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 1 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

20.7

Rank #348 Reported

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) Moonshot AI

40.9

Rank #134 Confirmed

Summary

  • They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. Gemma 3 1B scores higher in 0 categories and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) in 4 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
  • The widest gap is in math, where Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads 40.1 to 9.6.
  • The biggest single-benchmark swing is Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard: 7.2% for Gemma 3 1B and 59.1% for Kimi K2 (Jul 2025).

Side by side

Gemma 3 1B and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) specifications
Gemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
ProviderGoogleMoonshot AI
Noometry Index20.740.9
Released2025-03-122025-07-12
WeightsOpenOpen
Context window—262K
Max output—262K
Input $ / M tokens—$0.57
Output $ / M tokens—$2.30
Results tracked442

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 43.1 (#83)

Coding benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
SWE-bench Verified (bash only)—63.4%
Aider Polyglot—59.1%
GSO—4.9%
WeirdML—42.8%
LMArena Coding—1399
ALE-Bench—597.5

Agentic & Tool Use Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 32.2 (#59)

Agentic & Tool Use benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%59.1%
Terminal-Bench—35.7%
METR Time Horizons—59.2%

Reasoning Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 22.7 (#173)

Reasoning benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
SimpleBench—26.3%
Kagi LLM Benchmark—64.4%
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1384
Epoch Capabilities Index—146.02
ForecastBench—60.2

Math Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 40.1 (#81)

Math benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
Omni-MATH—65.4%
LMArena Math—1396
FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set)—21.4%
FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1)—0%

Knowledge Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 36.9 (#153)

Knowledge benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
GPQA Diamond19.9%—
MMLU-Pro—81.9%
Confabulations—20.4%
Vectara Hallucination Rate—17.9%
GPQA (HELM)—65.3%
LMArena Expert—1363

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 49.8 (#125)

Multilingual benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Non-English—1372
LMArena Chinese—1416
LMArena French—1379
LMArena German—1386
LMArena Japanese—1349
LMArena Korean—1324
LMArena Russian—1384
LMArena Spanish—1383

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 71.3 (#151)

Instruction Following benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
IFEval—85%
LMArena Instruction Following—1347

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 41.2 (#140)

Long Context benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
Fiction.LiveBench—66.7%
CL-bench—17.6%
LMArena Longer Query—1353

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Kimi K2 (Jul 2025): 62.5 (#76)

Writing & Preference benchmarks
BenchmarkGemma 3 1BKimi K2 (Jul 2025)
LMArena Text—1380
LMArena Creative Writing—1349
Short-Story Creative Writing—85.6%
EQ-Bench Creative Writing—1666
WildBench—86.2%
LMArena Multi-Turn—1371

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Kimi K2 (Jul 2025)?

Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.9 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Kimi K2 (Jul 2025) has 42.

Related comparisons

Go deeper