Noometry

Model comparison

Gemma 3 1B vs Hunyuan Turbos 20250226

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.

Gemma 3 1B Google

20.7

Rank #348 Reported

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 Tencent

40.6

Rank #138 Confirmed

Summary

  • The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads 36.4 to 7.1.
  • Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

Side by side

Gemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
ProviderGoogleTencent
Noometry Index20.740.6
Released2025-03-12—
WeightsOpenProprietary
Context window——
Max output——
Input $ / M tokens——
Output $ / M tokens——
Results tracked416

Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry

Category by category

Coding Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 39.3 (#148)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Coding—1361

Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: —

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard7.2%—

Reasoning Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 26.7 (#115)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
Chess Puzzles0%—
LMArena Hard Prompts—1374

Math Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 34.8 (#155)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-20251.1%—
LMArena Math—1359

Knowledge Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 leads

Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 36.4 (#158)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
GPQA Diamond19.9%—
LMArena Expert—1338

Multilingual Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 49.1 (#132)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Non-English—1362
LMArena Chinese—1416
LMArena French—1390
LMArena German—1356
LMArena Japanese—1338
LMArena Korean—1351
LMArena Russian—1368

Instruction Following Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 71.2 (#153)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Instruction Following—1344

Long Context Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 41.6 (#132)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Longer Query—1365

Writing & Preference Not comparable

Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan Turbos 20250226: 57.5 (#125)

BenchmarkGemma 3 1BHunyuan Turbos 20250226
LMArena Text—1377
LMArena Creative Writing—1358
LMArena Multi-Turn—1387

Frequently asked questions

Is Gemma 3 1B better than Hunyuan Turbos 20250226?

Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.6 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.

How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbos 20250226 has 16.

Related comparisons

Go deeper