Model comparison
Gemma 3 1B vs Hunyuan T1 20250711
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
Last verified . 0 shared benchmarks.
Google
TencentSummary
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads 38.1 to 7.1.
- Gemma 3 1B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.
Side by side
| Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 | |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Tencent | |
| Noometry Index | 20.7 | 41.8 |
| Released | 2025-03-12 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |
| Context window | — | — |
| Max output | — | — |
| Input $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Output $ / M tokens | — | — |
| Results tracked | 4 | 13 |
Sponsored placements are available on pages like this one. Advertise on Noometry
Category by category
Coding Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 40.2 (#129)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | — | 1389 |
Agentic & Tool Use Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: 13.5 (#144), Hunyuan T1 20250711: —
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 7.2% | — |
Reasoning Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 18.5 (#260), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 27.3 (#106)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1399 |
Math Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 9.6 (#310), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 36.0 (#132)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 1.1% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1414 |
Knowledge Hunyuan T1 20250711 leads
Gemma 3 1B: 7.1 (#309), Hunyuan T1 20250711: 38.1 (#139)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 19.9% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |
Multilingual Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 51.4 (#107)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1424 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1403 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1384 |
Instruction Following Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 72.8 (#130)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1375 |
Long Context Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 42.2 (#123)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1384 |
Writing & Preference Not comparable
Gemma 3 1B: —, Hunyuan T1 20250711: 59.7 (#105)
| Benchmark | Gemma 3 1B | Hunyuan T1 20250711 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1401 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1391 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1393 |
Frequently asked questions
Is Gemma 3 1B better than Hunyuan T1 20250711?
Hunyuan T1 20250711 is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 20.7 on the Noometry Index.
How many benchmarks do Gemma 3 1B and Hunyuan T1 20250711 share?
0 benchmarks have published results for both models. Gemma 3 1B has 4 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan T1 20250711 has 13.